Tag: Munsee

STOCKBRIDGE — For descendants of the town’s original settlers, the Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians, a return to their ancestral homelands always packs a powerful, emotional punch.

That was especially evident last week, as several tribal members dedicated a new public exhibit at the Trustees of Reservations’ Mission House at 19 Main St. Artifacts from the Mohican Nation’s archives went on display, curated from their museum in Bowler, Wis., in the area where the descendants have resided since the 1850s, after their forced exile from Stockbridge and a long westward journey, enduring tremendous hardship.

In the 1730s, after the 125-member tribe arrived from New York’s Upper Hudson Valley, Stockbridge — it originally was named Indian Town — was settled as a missionary community for the Mohicans and English to coexist and co-govern. The Rev. John Sergeant, an English settler, created a mission house in the town to promote Christianity.

The Stockbridge-Munsee Community now has a five-year agreement with the Trustees to tell its story through the Mission House exhibit, said Bonney Hartley, historic preservation manager for the tribe. “The whole exhibit is told in our own voice so we have a footprint on Main Street again,” she explained.

Stockbridge native Trudy Fadding, a rising junior at Williams College, worked with the tribe’s historical preservation office in Williamstown to help develop the exhibit.

Through a college internship with Hartley last winter, Fadding researched and prepared the content and text for the “Mohican Miles” exhibit panels.

Timeline

1734: The 125-member Mohican tribe arrives at Indian Town (later named Stockbridge) from its ancestral homelands in New York’s Upper Hudson Valley.

1736: John Sergeant, a European settler, creates a mission house to promote Christianity.

1737: A land grant signed by Massachusetts Bay Colony “Governour” Jonathan Belcher, on behalf of King George II, gave 1/60th of the territory each to…

Continue reading

History is written by the victors — except in the rare instance when it is not.

In 1939, authors Christina Marquand and Sarah Sedgwick wrote, “The Stockbridge of today, swept clean of its original owners, the Indians, is what the Williams and the English families up on the hill built for us.”

In March 1736, the General Court in Boston granted six square miles (23,040 acres) on the Housatonic River north of Sheffield to the Stockbridge-Munsee Band of the Mohican Nation. In addition, six white families, “the English” — missionary John Sergeant, brothers Timothy and Joseph Woodbridge, Ephraim Williams, Ephraim Brown, and Josiah Jones — were granted 400 acres each. The Mohicans retained 90 percent, the English 10 percent of the settlement called Indian Town. Later, it would be renamed Stockbridge.

Highway robbery

Col. John Stoddard, the surveyor, laid out 32 meadow lots along either side of the river for the Mohicans. The six “settling lots” for the English were on the hill. The Mohicans expressed concerns, even fear, but were assured by Stoddard that the law would protect them and their property.

In “The Red Man Dispossessed” (New England Quarterly, March 1994), Lion Miles traces the dispossession and ousting of the Mohicans from their land: “The Indians found the English were not content with [the land grants]. The Indians charged that the English claimed lands amounting to 4800 acres, twice the 2400 originally allocated.”

The methods of theft were various. With Williams in the lead and others following, many questionable practices were employed.

The whites purchased land from the Mohicans for outrageously low prices without first securing the approval of the General Court. The approval was required precisely to ensure fair prices.

To avoid involvement of the General Court, the English swapped land. The Mohicans did not understand relative land values and were duped. To…

Continue reading

Earlier this week, Xbox made the unexpected announcement that their console would be the “official console” of Battlefield 2042. This appeared to be the next step of a major partnership between EA, DICE and Microsoft. However, Xbox has now confirmed that this announcement does not mean that Battlefield 2042 will be exclusive to their console.

Is Xbox Really the “Official Console” of Battlefield 2042?

When Battlefield 2042 was first unveiled, during the Microsoft reveal event at E3, it was apparent that EA had partnered with Microsoft to some extent to market their upcoming release. Earlier this week, this partnership became clearer, when a new press release stated that the Xbox Series S and Series X consoles would be the; “official consoles of Battlefield 2042.”

The press release was somewhat vague, stating simply that this partnership would; “ensure that the next entry in the Battlefield franchise is the best one yet”. The statement did not offer any details as to how the game might utilise Xbox hardware in particular, receive extra support from Microsoft, etc. However, it appears to be one of five major partnerships which EA and DICE have entered into for Battlefield 2042. The other four partners are NVIDIA, Logitech, Polaris, and WD_BLACK. Once more, no firm details are yet available regarding what these partnerships will actually mean in practice.

Because of the vagueness of the press release, there was some confusion among fans, who took it to mean that Battlefield 2042 would now be Xbox exclusive. However, Xbox’s Senior Marketing Manager John Munsee has now said on Twitter that this will not be the case. Munsee clarified that the partnership is about; “marketing, branding, gameplay capture, etc.” rather than exclusivity….

Continue reading

Yesterday it was revealed that Xbox is the “official console of Battlefield 2042“, but we had no idea what that meant. It seems not many other people did either, considering the game’s not an exclusive. Somebody posed the question to an Xbox exec who revealed all on social media. Unfortunately, it’s not that exciting.

Josh Munsee, the senior marketing manager at Xbox, was asked on Twitter what it means by Xbox being the official console of Battlefield 2042. Munsee elaborated, revealing that all it essentially means is “marketing, branding, gameplay capture, etc.”

When asked if this was a usual practice, Munsee added: “It was part of a bigger series of announcements they made so maybe not “usual” but in context of listing full partnership announcements, not out of place.”

marketing, branding, gameplay capture, etc.— Josh Munsee (@joshmunsee) June 30, 2021

It was part of a bigger series of announcements they made so maybe not “usual” but in context of listing full partnership announcements, not out of place. I’ve seen maybe games do this.— Josh Munsee (@joshmunsee) June 30, 2021

Whether anything else comes out of this slogan remains to be seen, but it seems pretty tied down to being just simple marketing jargon – a theory we proposed when it came about. We’ll learn more about Battlefield 2042 in the coming weeks, especially with the EA Play Live event coming up on July 22, so maybe we’ll get further clarification there.

How do you feel about Xbox being “the official console of Battlefield 2042”? Let us know in the comments below.

Continue reading

In June 2020, Bruce Kettler, director of the Indiana State Department of Agriculture, saw a good challenge coming. He anticipated receiving roughly $4 million from the federal CARES Act passed to aid in COVID-19 relief.

“We considered ideas, and assisting meat processors in the state soon came to the top of the list of things we should do,” Kettler says. “Many smaller meat-processing operations in Indiana were adversely affected by the COVID-19 shutdown. This looked like an opportunity to help them recover, upgrade equipment, perhaps expand and, at the same time, improve conditions for worker safety.”

The money came from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, and in a few short months, the Indiana Meat Processing Expansion and Development Program through ISDA became reality. But it wasn’t an easy process.

“We had to put together a program, promote it and get the money actually spent by Dec. 30, 2020,” Kettler says. “That’s a large undertaking when you are talking about a grant program.”

Several divisions of state government played a big role, including the lieutenant governor’s office and the Office of Management and Budget, Kettler says. They also worked closely with the Indiana Meat Packers and Processors Association. Darla Dewig, whose family owns a meat processing facility in Gibson County, Ind., is the executive director.

“We were happy to come alongside and get this program going for our members,” she says. “There were real needs for more capacity, and for upgrading facilities to enhance worker safety.”

Successful rollout

It was September 2020 before all the details were worked out for the grant program. Nevertheless, ISDA received 60 applications from Indiana meat processors, requesting $6,810,732. Forty projects were approved and completed, with the state investing $3,784,293.74. Indiana in turn received the money from federal funds through the CARES Act.

…

Continue reading

Sign Up For Our Daily Newsletters

‘ + data.email + ‘ will receive this newsletter.’; } }); } ]]>

Front Page Podcast

Recommended

Commentary

Latest Cartoon

Taking the high road

Question of the Day

How confident are you in America’s infrastructure?

Question of the Day

Story TOpics

Continue reading

MUNSEE-DELAWARE FIRST NATION, ONT. — “I’ve heard some very tragic stories and I’ve seen the impacts of those experiences with these people. Abuse, neglect, malnutrition, slave labour,” says Chief Mark Peters of Munsee-Delaware First Nation.

Many First Nations communities across Canada grieve as the country continues to discover mass unmarked grave sites.

The most recent, was found near Cowessess First Nation in southern Saskatchewan where roughly 751 sites were discovered.

“It’s not surprising that people don’t know. To an extent, if we hadn’t experienced and known our own people’s experiences here, we wouldn’t have known either,” says Peters.

Every Child Matters shirt seen here on June 25, 2021. (Jaden Lee-Lincoln/CTV London)

Nearby, the Chippewas of the Thames First Nation is also feeling the emotional effects of recent discoveries, telling CTV News London in a statement, “Our hearts are heavy with sorrow today. More weight has been added to the collective grief felt by Indigenous people.”

Both First Nations communities are calling on the government for resources to help bring them closure.

“We demand that the Canadian government and the Catholic Church respond to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action 71 to 76 and to hand over all documents and records from these institutions which have been withheld from us and greatly hinder our ability to identify and repatriate the remains of our loved ones,” the Chippewas of the Thames First Nation said in a statement.

Mount Elgin Residential School in Muncey, Ont. seen here in this undated photo. (Jaden Lee-Lincoln/CTV London)

The community plans to conduct their own investigations to uncover unmarked grave sites on the grounds of the former Mount Elgin Residential School, which didn’t…

Continue reading

The Coxsackie-Athens Board of Education and the Stockbridge-Munsee Community closed the book on a chapter in local history last week. With sports teams from Washington in the NFL to Cleveland in Major League Baseball and many smaller ones in between doing away with offensive images, Coxsackie-Athens voted 6-3 to retire the Indians as its mascot and logo.

The decision did not come easy. It was preceded by months of meetings, a public forum, surveys and two conversations with a representative of the Stockbridge-Munsee Community, the indigenous peoples who once lived on lands where the school district is now located. The process, which sometimes took on the appearance of negotiations among school board members, the public for and against the idea and a Native American nation, drew criticism from both sides of the issue. Supporters of eliminating the mascot said it is derogatory to indigenous people; opponents claimed the mascot is a part of the district’s heritage and is intended to be perceived as a positive symbol of strength and determination.

If the school district lost a mascot, it gained something stronger — a more profound education. Coxsackie-Athens will add components to the curriculum to teach students about the history and culture of the indigenous peoples who once lived in the area.

Although the district was evenly divided on the issue, supporters of retiring the mascot stayed on point. Board of Education President Michael Donahue said the Indians mascot can be hurtful to some people even if others don’t perceive it that way.

“We need to recognize that this hurts some people,” Donahue said. “I think one of the folks that wrote in to us said, ‘Remember what we teach our kids — if it hurts, stop it.’ I believe that this hurts some people even if there are folks that don’t believe it is…

Continue reading

COXSACKIE — The board of education voted by a 6-3 margin Thursday to retire the district’s mascot and team name, the Indians.

The decision comes after months of meetings, a public forum, surveys and two conversations with a representative of the Stockbridge-Munsee Community, the indigenous peoples who once lived on lands where the school district is now located.

The process drew criticism on both sides of the issue, with supporters of eliminating the mascot saying it is derogatory to indigenous people and opponents claiming the mascot is a part of the district’s heritage and is intended to be perceived as a positive symbol of strength and determination.

Coxsackie-Athens Board of Education member David Taylor introduced a motion to retire the mascot.

“Given everything that we heard and talked about, I want to put a motion on the table to officially retire the mascot and build a community program,” Taylor said.

In addition to eliminating the mascot, the district will add components to the curriculum to teach students about the history and culture of the indigenous peoples who once lived in the area.

The motion drew debate from both sides.

“We are very divided on the mascot issue at this point. Both sides are evenly divided,” board of education member Barton Wallace said to open the discussion. “I would ask a little more patience as we go through this process. First of all, I think we need to bring both sides together on this a little more. The messaging on the mascot issue still needs to be increased and worked on to bring both sides together to find common ground.”

Wallace said he was not comfortable “dismissing” a large group of people who were opposed to retiring the mascot.

“I can certainly transition to another mascot, but I think we need more discussion and more work on bringing both sides…

Continue reading